![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
by Tom Kee
At last another tax season has come and gone. You've just paid your taxes and made some investments, yet you might very well be inadvertently supporting a company that goes against your core beliefs. How do you know what companies do with their products, and what influence can your investment have on them? What we at BWZ hope to explain is what investing with a "social conscience" really is, determine if it's right for you and your portfolio, and check the latest performance numbers on a few funds. What Is Socially Responsible Investing, Anyway?Socially responsible investing (SRI) is a way to build an investment portfolio that reflects your morals, values, and belief system. It may involve avoiding companies with corporate practices you deem unacceptable or supporting acceptable ones. The strategy of socially responsible investing grew from an early desire by many in the religious community to avoid investing in companies that profited from the sale of alcohol, tobacco, or gambling products. SRI became a more popular investment alternative in the 1980s. In 1984, the number of people involved in what we now call SRI evolved from around $40 billion to close to $1 trillion by the end of 1995. The portfolios of churches, universities and colleges, and state and city pension funds were among the largest financial assets involved with SRI. How Did SRI Get Started?SRI was started by investors during the Vietnam War who did not want their investments supporting the war. From that beginning, social responsible investing rapidly spread as investors began screening their investments for such issues as corporate environmental practices, whether or not U.S. business operations and investments in South Africa supported apartheid, and how American companies treated their employees. Until the mid 1980s, SRI was considered to be nothing more than what Fortune magazine sarcastically called "feel-good investing" or what would be labeled today as "politically correct" behavior. Despite that sentiment, investing with a social conscious entered the mainstream as the investors emotions were stirred by issues such as apartheid in South Africa, the environment, and abortion. The number of mutual and money market funds that utilized some type of social screening increased from about a half a dozen in the early 1980s to over 60 by 1995. How Does SRI Work?Socially responsible investing involves a great deal of research in order to understand each investments' screening strategy and profit potential. As in all issues concerning values and money, investors may find that the distinction between acceptable and unacceptable a bit blurred. Many investors could interpret social responsibility as 'not being socially irresponsible'. But that's not entirely true. The oldest social screen around is the sin screen: No tobacco, liquor, or gambling investments. Recently new funds have been formed to address issues such as animal testing, abortion, armaments, nuclear power, and pornography. Company screening can be made either negatively to avoid 'bad' companies or positively to support 'good' ones. Or the fund can address an issue like abortion taking a stance such as 'pro-life' or 'pro-choice'. Although a Socially Responsible fund can include many overlapping criteria, the basic structure of the every fund can be simplified with the following four components:
What's My Role?Your social investing strategy should be formed after you have set your overall financial goals. The first step in socially responsible investing is to develop your social investment criteria. These criteria may be exclusionary, inclusionary, or activist. Exclusionary, or negative, criteria are factors that will cause you to not invest in a certain company. Violations of equal employment laws, tobacco production, birth control, and animal testing are all examples of what might be considered negative criteria. Inclusionary, or positive, criteria are those factors that would encourage you to invest in a company. Positive advertising policies, solid waste reduction programs, good records of charitable giving, and community involvement are examples of what might be considered positive criteria. As a socially conscious investor, you may follow several different strategies once your criteria have been developed. You may choose to avoid investing in companies whose policies or practices violate your social criteria. You may choose to invest in companies with policies or practices you view as positive by becoming a shareholder. You may also identify a company that violates your social criteria and work to reform it from within as an active shareholder. Performances: The Good and the BadThe mainstream investment community has traditionally downplayed the increasing popularity of SRI on the grounds that the fund manager has limited flexibility to maneuver due the constraints placed on the fund by the criteria. For this reason ,SRI funds are thought to under-perform the market. In March 1996, the Progressive Environmental Fund liquidated all their SRI funds 'in the best interest of the shareholders' due to low assets and poor performance. After a stellar year in 1994, the Parnassus Fund managed by Jerome Dodson, returned -2.91% in 1995 in a market that saw the S&P 500 index return over 30%. The fund experienced a bit of bad luck in the last quarter with some technology stocks doing poorly and a larger holding, Sunrise Medical, who had the misfortune of some unethical managers at one division who were mis-stating revenues and expenses. The managers were let go, the financials restated, and the company instituted safeguards against this happening again. Nevertheless, the stock took a beating. This and other portfolio mishaps occurred after good returns for most of that year. The Parnassus Fund also received a large capital surge by investors looking at past great performances. However, recent depressed share prices show that the Parnassus Fund may be regarded as a good value. But all is not gloom and doom. Funds with strict criteria such as the Amana Growth Fund returned 22.4% in 1995. And SRI funds are not without their own high flyers such as new-comer Neuberger & Berman Socially Responsive Fund, Domini Social Equity Growth, and Citizens Trust Emerging Growth which kept pace with the sizzling S&P500 index in 1995. (See the side-bar for more fund performances.)
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
For a limited time you can call 1-800-713-8086, and recieve a FREE copy of You, Your Money, and the World, an informative brochure on SRB/SRI published by Co-op America. |

| Disclaimer . © Copyright 1995, 1996, Better World Publishing All rights reserved. Better WorldSM and BWZ are Service Marks of Better World Publishing .... Questions and comments? |